A violent poetry bleeds through the surface of Paint and Concrete, Gaza. Here, the boundaries between paint and war-torn architecture collapse into one another. A cityscape once filled with homes and voices is now reduced to pulverized concrete and shredded steel — but it’s not rendered through realism. Instead, the scene is thick with aggressive, impasto brushstrokes, as if the paint itself is screaming.
The left side of the composition is almost entirely consumed by textured chaos: slabs of teal, ochre, chalk-white, and deep crimson collide like memories too traumatic to separate. It's the skin of the painting, and also the skin of the city—peeled back, brutal, and raw. These strokes don’t just depict destruction; they embody it. They smear over a group of silhouetted figures wandering through the middle of the street, blurred into the landscape as if time itself is eroding them. We do not see their faces. They are everyone, and no one.
To the right, a bombed-out red car sits like a corpse with its mouth open. The surrounding buildings are skeletons — their innards exposed, ghostly and grey. Everything is caked in ash and dust, like the aftermath of a biblical firestorm.
What’s striking is the clash between representational ruin and painterly abstraction. The painting asks: what can image do when language fails? What can brushstrokes say that the news won’t? This isn’t just a visual document — it’s an indictment, an elegy, a scream.
Paint and Concrete, Gaza doesn’t want to be beautiful. And yet, in its rage and sorrow, it becomes unforgettable.